Model comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs Mercury

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

53.3

Rank #36 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Luna scores higher in 6 categories and Mercury in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Luna leads 48.2 to 17.5.

Side by side

GPT-6 Luna and Mercury specifications
GPT-6 LunaMercury
ProviderOpenAIInception
Noometry Index53.337.6
Released2026-09-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked429

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMercury
LMArena Coding14391322
DeepSWE66.6%—
FrontierCode42.4%—
LMArena WebDev1581—
SciCode54.6%—
ALE-Bench1,577—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54), Mercury: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMercury
APEX-Agents44.3%—
GDP.pdf23%—

Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMercury
LMArena Hard Prompts14111285
ARC-AGI-259.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—21.6%
NYT Connections (extended)68.7%—
ARC-AGI-186.7%—
CritPt19.4%—
Chess Puzzles31%—
Mystery Game Puzzles7%—
DTBench90.1%—
LMCA44.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.28—

Math Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15), Mercury: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMercury
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)78.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 456.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench64%—
LMArena Math1416—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41), Mercury: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMercury
GPQA Diamond90.5%—
SimpleQA Verified41.4%—
LMArena Expert1444—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30), Mercury: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMercury
LMArena Vision1217—
Blueprint-Bench 231.2%—
Furniture Assembly44.2%—

Multilingual GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMercury
LMArena Non-English13861260
LMArena Chinese1433—
LMArena French1420—
LMArena German1369—
LMArena Japanese1369—
LMArena Korean1360—
LMArena Russian1394—
LMArena Spanish1393—

Instruction Following GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMercury
LMArena Instruction Following14091239

Long Context GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMercury
LMArena Longer Query14091266

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMercury
LMArena Text13911282
LMArena Creative Writing13631191
LMArena Multi-Turn13961282

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Luna better than Mercury?

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6 Luna or Mercury better for coding?

GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Luna and Mercury share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Luna has 42 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper