Model comparison
GPT-6 Luna vs Grok 4.1 Fast
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Luna scores higher in 8 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Luna leads 76.1 to 31.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 64% for GPT-6 Luna and 4% for Grok 4.1 Fast.
- GPT-6 Luna is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.20 / $0.50 for Grok 4.1 Fast.
- GPT-6 Luna accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| GPT-6 Luna | Grok 4.1 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 53.3 | 41.4 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2025-06-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Max output | 128K | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 42 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25), Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1581 | 1242 |
| LMArena Coding | 1439 | 1411 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,577 | 394.93 |
| DeepSWE | 66.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 42.4% | — |
| SciCode | 54.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.1 Fast leads
GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54), Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 44.3% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 69.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.1% |
| GDP.pdf | 23% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,107 |
Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41), Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.7% | 87.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1411 | 1407 |
| DTBench | 90.1% | 87.7% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 59.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | — | 56% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 86.7% | — |
| CritPt | 19.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 31% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| LMCA | 44.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.28 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |
Math GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15), Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 64% | 4% |
| LMArena Math | 1416 | 1408 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 78.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 56.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41), Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | 1399 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.8% |
Multimodal GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30), Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1217 | 1201 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 31.2% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 44.2% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117), Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1386 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1433 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1420 | 1415 |
| LMArena German | 1369 | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1369 | 1349 |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | 1394 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1393 | 1413 |
Instruction Following GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | 1376 |
Long Context Too close to call
GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1390 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1391 | 1408 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1363 | 1394 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1396 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1327 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 Luna better than Grok 4.1 Fast?
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Grok 4.1 Fast?
GPT-6 Luna is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Grok 4.1 Fast lists at $0.20 and $0.50.
Is GPT-6 Luna or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?
GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6 Luna does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Luna and Grok 4.1 Fast share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Luna has 42 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.