Model comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

45.1

Rank #65 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.1

Rank #266 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Luna scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-6 Luna leads 58.4 to 31.2.
  • Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 Luna and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
GPT-6 LunaGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderOpenAIIBM
Noometry Index45.131.1
Released2026-09-22—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked1814

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 54.7 (#24), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding14481113
DeepSWE66.6%—
FrontierCode42.4%—
LMArena WebDev1583—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—35.4%

Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 31.7 (#68), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14151092
NYT Connections (extended)68.7%—

Math GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 35.6 (#140), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math13961143

Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 40.1 (#110), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert14581087

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 42.0 (#27), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
Furniture Assembly44.2%—

Multilingual GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 51.0 (#111), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13901037
LMArena Chinese14251063
LMArena Russian13921060
LMArena Spanish1416—

Instruction Following GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 74.7 (#85), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14141088

Long Context GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 43.3 (#95), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14171122

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 58.4 (#115), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text13921096
LMArena Creative Writing13571071
LMArena Multi-Turn14001063

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Luna better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6 Luna or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.7 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Luna and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Luna has 18 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper