Model comparison

GPT-6 Astra vs Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5

GPT-6 Astra is the stronger model overall, scoring 70.8 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 costs 50× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Astra's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Astra OpenAI

70.8

Rank #1 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Astra scores higher in 8 categories and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Astra leads 85.1 to 26.8.
  • Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 is cheaper at $0.40 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $50 for GPT-6 Astra.
  • GPT-6 Astra accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 Astra and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 specifications
GPT-6 AstraNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
ProviderOpenAINVIDIA
Noometry Index70.840.3
Released2026-09-032025-07-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M131K
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$10$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$50$0.40
Results tracked5612

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 73.7 (#2), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 39.8 (#154)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Coding14871355
DeepSWE74.1%—
FrontierCode53.3%—
LMArena WebDev1786—
FrontierSWE65.5%—
SciCode56.5%—
GSO79.4%—
WeirdML93.6%—
MirrorCode46.7%—
ALE-Bench2,951—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Astra: 52.9 (#3), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
APEX-Agents64.7%—
Remote Labor Index20.8%—
BALROG68.3%—
GDP.pdf34.2%—
Vending-Bench 215,515—

Reasoning GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 85.1 (#1), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 26.8 (#128)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14621336
ARC-AGI-295%—
NYT Connections (extended)98.1%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
Chess Puzzles72%—
EBR-Bench76.2%—
Mystery Game Puzzles84%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA64.4%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index166.45—

Math GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 93.5 (#2), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 38.2 (#141)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Math14651392
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 497.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench99%—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#1), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 36.7 (#165)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Expert14831330
GPQA Diamond95.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam54.8%—
SimpleQA Verified75.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Astra: 55.0 (#3), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Vision1281—
Blueprint-Bench 249.7%—
Furniture Assembly80%—
LMArena Document1468—

Multilingual GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 53.7 (#61), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 45.5 (#168)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Non-English14301316
LMArena Japanese13791300
LMArena Russian14361332
LMArena Chinese1484—
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1440—
LMArena Korean1426—
LMArena Spanish1407—

Instruction Following GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 76.3 (#44), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 68.6 (#188)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Instruction Following14501299

Long Context GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 44.5 (#62), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 40.0 (#164)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Longer Query14561315

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Astra leads

GPT-6 Astra: 75.3 (#7), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 53.1 (#159)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 AstraNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Text14411338
LMArena Creative Writing14181307
LMArena Multi-Turn14481334
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2173—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Astra better than Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5?

GPT-6 Astra is the stronger model overall, scoring 70.8 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index. Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 costs 50× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Astra's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Astra or Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5?

Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Astra lists at $10 and $50.

Is GPT-6 Astra or Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 better for coding?

GPT-6 Astra scores higher on coding benchmarks: 73.7 versus 39.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Astra does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Astra and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Astra has 56 scored results on Noometry and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper