Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Step 3

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 9 categories and Step 3 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 37.6.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 Sol and Step 3 specifications
GPT-6.1 SolStep 3
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index65.640.5
Released2026-09-29—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolStep 3
LMArena Coding14871367
DeepSWE75.2%—
FrontierCode50.2%—
LMArena WebDev1755—
SciCode55.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolStep 3
APEX-Agents60%—
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolStep 3
LMArena Hard Prompts14661355
ARC-AGI-294.2%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
NYT Connections (extended)95.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
EBR-Bench54.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles80%—
Epoch Capabilities Index166.09—

Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolStep 3
LMArena Math14641366
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4100%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolStep 3
LMArena Expert15021333
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.9%—

Multimodal GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5), Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolStep 3
LMArena Vision12881177
Furniture Assembly80%—

Multilingual GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolStep 3
LMArena Non-English14381327
LMArena Chinese14771397
LMArena Russian14551331
LMArena German—1371
LMArena Korean—1269
LMArena Spanish—1371

Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolStep 3
LMArena Instruction Following14681332

Long Context GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolStep 3
LMArena Longer Query14651326

Writing & Preference GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolStep 3
LMArena Text14471350
LMArena Creative Writing14321321
LMArena Multi-Turn14491341

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Step 3?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Step 3 better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Step 3 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper