Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#82); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

42.1

Unranked Sparse

Qwen3 Max

Alibaba (Qwen)

43.5

Rank #82 Confirmed

Summary

The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 42.4.
Qwen3 Max is cheaper at $1.20 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3 Max specifications
	GPT-6.1 Sol	Qwen3 Max
Provider	OpenAI	Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index	42.1	43.5
Released	2026-09-29	2025-09-23
Weights	Proprietary	Proprietary
Context window	1.05M	262K
Max output	128K	66K
Input $ / M tokens	$2	$1.20
Output $ / M tokens	$10	$6
Results tracked	2	33

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4, Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-6.1 Sol	Qwen3 Max
DeepSWE	75.2%	—
LMArena Coding	—	1456
ALE-Bench	—	370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-6.1 Sol	Qwen3 Max
GDP.pdf	32%	—
Vending-Bench 2	—	71.56

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-6.1 Sol	Qwen3 Max
Kagi LLM Benchmark	—	72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)	—	30.1%
Chess Puzzles	—	4%
LMArena Hard Prompts	—	1448
Mystery Game Puzzles	—	5%
DTBench	—	82.1%
LMCA	—	28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index	—	142.41

Math Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-6.1 Sol	Qwen3 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)	—	18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	—	73.3%
LMArena Math	—	1447
MATH Level 5	—	97.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-6.1 Sol	Qwen3 Max
GPQA Diamond	—	72.6%
SimpleQA Verified	—	48.7%
LMArena Expert	—	1457

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-6.1 Sol	Qwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English	—	1429
LMArena Chinese	—	1479
LMArena French	—	1450
LMArena German	—	1463
LMArena Japanese	—	1399
LMArena Korean	—	1397
LMArena Russian	—	1428
LMArena Spanish	—	1463

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-6.1 Sol	Qwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following	—	1420

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-6.1 Sol	Qwen3 Max
Fiction.LiveBench	—	66.7%
CL-bench	—	14.5%
LMArena Longer Query	—	1439

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-6.1 Sol	Qwen3 Max
LMArena Text	—	1439
LMArena Creative Writing	—	1401
LMArena Multi-Turn	—	1446

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#82); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3 Max share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.