Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Flash

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 73× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6.1 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 38.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 93.7% for GPT-6.1 Sol and 19.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index65.639.9
Released2026-09-292026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.03
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.13
Results tracked347

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Flash
DeepSWE75.2%—
FrontierCode50.2%—
LMArena WebDev1755—
SciCode55.8%—
LMArena Coding1487—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Flash
APEX-Agents60%—
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)95.5%43.8%
Chess Puzzles61%23%
Mystery Game Puzzles80%15%
Epoch Capabilities Index166.09144.64
ARC-AGI-294.2%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
EBR-Bench54.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1466—

Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%86.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4100%—
ProofBench99%—
LMArena Math1464—

Knowledge GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond95.4%82.3%
SimpleQA Verified73.9%—
LMArena Expert1502—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision1288—
Furniture Assembly80%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1438—
LMArena Chinese1477—
LMArena Russian1455—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1468—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1465—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1447—
LMArena Creative Writing1432—
LMArena Multi-Turn1449—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 73× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6.1 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper