Model comparison
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 38.9.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-09-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 2 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1346 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 32% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
Math Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1307 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1298 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.