Model comparison
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Llama 3.2 11B
Neither GPT-6.1 Sol nor Llama 3.2 11B has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 34.3 to 27.0.
- Llama 3.2 11B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6.1 Sol | Llama 3.2 11B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 31.6 |
| Released | 2026-09-29 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 2 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4, Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3, Llama 3.2 11B: 27.0
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | — | 56.5% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Llama 3.2 11B: 23.8
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 966 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Llama 3.2 11B?
Neither GPT-6.1 Sol nor Llama 3.2 11B has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Llama 3.2 11B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 11B has 3.