Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

Kimi K2.5 Instant has enough public results to be ranked (#92); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

42.1

Unranked Sparse

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

42.9

Rank #92 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 42.3.
  • Kimi K2.5 Instant has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 Sol and Kimi K2.5 Instant specifications
GPT-6.1 SolKimi K2.5 Instant
ProviderOpenAIMoonshot AI
Noometry Index42.142.9
Released2026-09-29—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2.5 Instant
DeepSWE75.2%—
LMArena WebDev—1404
LMArena Coding—1483

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3, Kimi K2.5 Instant: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2.5 Instant
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Hard Prompts—1443

Math Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Math—1443

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Expert—1438

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Vision—1254

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Non-English—1406
LMArena Chinese—1450
LMArena French—1403
LMArena German—1413
LMArena Korean—1378
LMArena Russian—1404
LMArena Spanish—1448

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Instruction Following—1430

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Longer Query—1435

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Text—1420
LMArena Creative Writing—1379
LMArena Multi-Turn—1427

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Kimi K2.5 Instant has enough public results to be ranked (#92); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 42.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper