Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs InternVL2_5-78B

Neither GPT-6.1 Sol nor InternVL2_5-78B has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

42.1

Unranked Sparse

InternVL2_5-78B Shanghai AI Lab

38.6

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • InternVL2_5-78B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 Sol and InternVL2_5-78B specifications
GPT-6.1 SolInternVL2_5-78B
ProviderOpenAIShanghai AI Lab
Noometry Index42.138.6
Released2026-09-292024-12-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked21

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4, InternVL2_5-78B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolInternVL2_5-78B
DeepSWE75.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3, InternVL2_5-78B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolInternVL2_5-78B
GDP.pdf32%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, InternVL2_5-78B: 37.8

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolInternVL2_5-78B
Video-MME—72.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than InternVL2_5-78B?

Neither GPT-6.1 Sol nor InternVL2_5-78B has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and InternVL2_5-78B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and InternVL2_5-78B has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper