Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Hy3

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 44.2 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6.1 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Hy3 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 81.9 to 26.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 95.5% for GPT-6.1 Sol and 41.2% for Hy3.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 SolHy3
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index65.644.2
Released2026-09-292026-07-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output128K128K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.13
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.53
Results tracked3419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8), Hy3: 46.8 (#63)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy3
LMArena WebDev17551508
LMArena Coding14871464
DeepSWE75.2%—
FrontierCode50.2%—
SciCode55.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26), Hy3: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy3
APEX-Agents60%—
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2), Hy3: 26.1 (#136)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy3
NYT Connections (extended)95.5%41.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts14661447
ARC-AGI-294.2%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
EBR-Bench54.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles80%—
Epoch Capabilities Index166.09—

Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1), Hy3: 40.1 (#93)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy3
LMArena Math14641475
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4100%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4), Hy3: 40.8 (#114)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy3
LMArena Expert15021460
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5), Hy3: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy3
LMArena Vision1288—
Furniture Assembly80%—

Multilingual Too close to call

GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46), Hy3: 53.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy3
LMArena Non-English14381426
LMArena Chinese14771493
LMArena Russian14551432
LMArena French—1461
LMArena German—1439
LMArena Japanese—1392
LMArena Korean—1395
LMArena Spanish—1456

Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29), Hy3: 75.1 (#70)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy3
LMArena Instruction Following14681426

Long Context Too close to call

GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54), Hy3: 44.1 (#75)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy3
LMArena Longer Query14651442

Writing & Preference GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63), Hy3: 62.2 (#81)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHy3
LMArena Text14471439
LMArena Creative Writing14321402
LMArena Multi-Turn14491436

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Hy3?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 44.2 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6.1 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Hy3 better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 46.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Hy3 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper