Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has enough public results to be ranked (#183); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

42.1

Unranked Sparse

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.0

Rank #183 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 37.6.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 Sol and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
GPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index42.138.0
Released2026-09-29—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
DeepSWE75.2%—
LMArena Coding—1307

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts—1286

Math Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math—1281

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert—1276

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English—1265
LMArena Chinese—1346
LMArena Russian—1266

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following—1277

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query—1342

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text—1288
LMArena Creative Writing—1264
LMArena Multi-Turn—1284

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has enough public results to be ranked (#183); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper