Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 32.8.
  • Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 Sol and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
GPT-6.1 SolGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderOpenAIIBM
Noometry Index65.631.6
Released2026-09-29—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3414

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding14871112
DeepSWE75.2%—
FrontierCode50.2%—
LMArena WebDev1755—
SciCode55.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—35.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
APEX-Agents60%—
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14661092
ARC-AGI-294.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)95.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
EBR-Bench54.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles80%—
Epoch Capabilities Index166.09—

Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math14641143
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4100%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert15021087
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Vision1288—
Furniture Assembly80%—

Multilingual GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14381037
LMArena Chinese14771063
LMArena Russian14551060

Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14681088

Long Context GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14651122

Writing & Preference GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text14471096
LMArena Creative Writing14321071
LMArena Multi-Turn14491063

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper