Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs Wizardlm 70b
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5 Pro leads 39.2 to 19.8.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 272K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.26 | — |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than Wizardlm 70b?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5 Pro or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.