Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs Qwen1.5-14B
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.2 to 29.3.
- Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 32.1 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 272K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1138 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52), Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.26 | — |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1125 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1147 |
| LMArena French | — | 1115 |
| LMArena German | — | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1085 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1102 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than Qwen1.5-14B?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5 Pro or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Qwen1.5-14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.