Model comparison

GPT-5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 43.4 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5 costs 236× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5 Pro OpenAI

46.4

Rank #64 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.7 to 40.8.
  • MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $120 for GPT-5 Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 400K.
  • MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5 specifications
GPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Noometry Index46.443.4
Released2025-10-062026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K1.05M
Max output272K131K
Input $ / M tokens$15$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$120$0.28
Results tracked1223

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena WebDev—1438
SciCode—43.1%
WeirdML60.4%—
LMArena Coding—1469
ALE-Bench—513.95
AlgoTune1.31—

Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads

GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5
ARC-AGI-218.3%—
SimpleBench61.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark76.8%—
ARC-AGI-170.2%—
CritPt—3.7%
EnigmaEval18.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1450
Epoch Capabilities Index150.28—

Math GPT-5 Pro leads

GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)55.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 419.5%—
ProofBench—16%
LMArena Math—1436
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads

GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5
Humanity's Last Exam31.6%—
LMArena Expert—1460

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision—1247

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Non-English—1404
LMArena Chinese—1468
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1421
LMArena Japanese—1306
LMArena Korean—1363
LMArena Russian—1395
LMArena Spanish—1416

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Instruction Following—1434

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Longer Query—1445

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text—1428
LMArena Creative Writing—1393
LMArena Multi-Turn—1445

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5 Pro better than MiMo-V2.5?

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 43.4 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5 costs 236× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Pro lists at $15 and $120.

Is GPT-5 Pro or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (44.0 vs 43.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper