Model comparison

GPT-5 Pro vs Llama 3.1-405B

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5 Pro OpenAI

46.2

Rank #58 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.4

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 3.1-405B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5 Pro leads 48.0 to 17.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 60.4% for GPT-5 Pro and 21.4% for Llama 3.1-405B.
  • Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5 Pro and Llama 3.1-405B specifications
GPT-5 ProLlama 3.1-405B
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index46.230.4
Released2025-10-062024-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output272K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$120—
Results tracked1242

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5 Pro leads

GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77), Llama 3.1-405B: 32.7 (#257)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProLlama 3.1-405B
WeirdML60.4%21.4%
LMArena Coding—1291
AlgoTune1.31—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 20.9 (#131)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProLlama 3.1-405B
TheAgentCompany—7.4%
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads

GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52), Llama 3.1-405B: 16.4 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProLlama 3.1-405B
SimpleBench61.6%23%
Kagi LLM Benchmark76.8%45%
Epoch Capabilities Index150.26128.76
ARC-AGI-218.3%—
ARC-AGI-170.2%—
EnigmaEval18.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1270
DTBench—61.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—82.9%
ForecastBench—59.9
HellaSwag—89.2%
PIQA—85.9%
WinoGrande—89.2%

Math GPT-5 Pro leads

GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53), Llama 3.1-405B: 17.3 (#283)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProLlama 3.1-405B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)55.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 419.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—9.7%
Omni-MATH—24.9%
LMArena Math—1281
MATH Level 5—49.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads

GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39), Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#221)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProLlama 3.1-405B
GPQA Diamond—50.9%
Humanity's Last Exam31.6%—
MMLU-Pro—72.3%
Confabulations—17.6%
GPQA (HELM)—52.2%
LMArena Expert—1243
ARC (AI2) Challenge—95.3%
MMLU—84.5%
TriviaQA—82.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 40.9 (#209)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Non-English—1248
LMArena Chinese—1242
LMArena French—1278
LMArena German—1252
LMArena Japanese—1208
LMArena Korean—1184
LMArena Russian—1265
LMArena Spanish—1259

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 66.1 (#209)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProLlama 3.1-405B
IFEval—81.1%
LMArena Instruction Following—1259

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#192)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Longer Query—1266

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 39.1 (#246)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Text—1284
LMArena Creative Writing—1262
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—870
WildBench—78.3%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1297

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5 Pro better than Llama 3.1-405B?

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5 Pro or Llama 3.1-405B better for coding?

GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 32.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Llama 3.1-405B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-405B has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper