Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs Granite 4.0 Micro
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 1012× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.2 to 9.9.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $120 for GPT-5 Pro.
- GPT-5 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 131K.
- Granite 4.0 Micro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | 2025-10-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | 131K |
| Max output | 272K | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | $0.017 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | $0.11 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52), Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.26 | — |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53), Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 20.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39), Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 39.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.7% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 84.9% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 67% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than Granite 4.0 Micro?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 1012× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Pro or Granite 4.0 Micro?
Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Pro lists at $15 and $120.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Granite 4.0 Micro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.