Model comparison
GPT-5 Mini vs Qwen1.5-72B
GPT-5 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Mini scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Mini leads 45.5 to 11.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 75% for GPT-5 Mini and 28.8% for Qwen1.5-72B.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Mini | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2025-08-07 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 60 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 40.0 (#134), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1406 | 1166 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 64.7% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 59.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 39.7% | — |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| ALE-Bench | 799.77 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.38 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5 Mini: 31.0 (#64), Qwen1.5-72B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 34.8% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 55.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -31.18 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 24.1 (#153), Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1380 | 1148 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 54.3% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 8.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 10% | — |
| DTBench | 80.5% | — |
| LMCA | 34.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.51 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61 | — |
Math GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 46.3 (#59), Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1377 | 1164 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 72.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 97.8% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 27.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 6.3% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 45.5 (#80), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75% | 28.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1377 | 1136 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 19.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 83.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 75.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5 Mini: 35.0 (#80), Qwen1.5-72B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1202 | — |
| VPCT | 40.2% | — |
Multilingual GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 49.1 (#131), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1387 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1385 | 1158 |
| LMArena German | 1366 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 1306 | 1049 |
| LMArena Russian | 1362 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1355 | 1110 |
Instruction Following GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 76.4 (#43), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1357 | 1142 |
| IFEval | 92.7% | — |
Long Context GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 41.9 (#127), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1355 | 1157 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 55.4 (#143), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1373 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1325 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1363 | 1160 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1313 | — |
| WildBench | 85.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Mini better than Qwen1.5-72B?
GPT-5 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5 Mini or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?
GPT-5 Mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Mini and Qwen1.5-72B share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Mini has 60 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.