Model comparison

GPT-5-Codex vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5-Codex OpenAI

37.9

Rank #192 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5-Codex scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 2 categories, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.50 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5-Codex.
  • GPT-5-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5-Codex and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
GPT-5-CodexQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.943.0
Released2025-09-152025-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K131K
Max output128K33K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.50
Output $ / M tokens$10$2
Results tracked325

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

GPT-5-Codex: 42.4 (#103), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
WeirdML54.5%—
LMArena Coding—1440

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: 31.0 (#72), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Terminal-Bench44.3%—

Reasoning Too close to call

GPT-5-Codex: 30.9 (#83), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%66.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1428

Math Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Omni-MATH—46.7%
LMArena Math—1440

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%
LMArena Expert—1417

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1407
LMArena Chinese—1460
LMArena French—1413
LMArena German—1417
LMArena Japanese—1395
LMArena Korean—1364
LMArena Russian—1404
LMArena Spanish—1435

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
IFEval—81%
LMArena Instruction Following—1389

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%
LMArena Longer Query—1403

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text—1417
LMArena Creative Writing—1334
WildBench—80.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1416

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5-Codex better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5-Codex or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; GPT-5-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is GPT-5-Codex or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.4 vs 42.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5-Codex and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5-Codex has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper