Model comparison

GPT-5-Codex vs Mistral 7B

GPT-5-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 14× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5-Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5-Codex OpenAI

37.9

Rank #192 Reported

Mistral 7B Mistral AI

23.0

Rank #351 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5-Codex leads 30.9 to 13.1.
  • Mistral 7B is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5-Codex.
  • GPT-5-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 8K.
  • Mistral 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5-Codex and Mistral 7B specifications
GPT-5-CodexMistral 7B
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Noometry Index37.923.0
Released2025-09-152023-09-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K8K
Max output128K8K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.25
Results tracked337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5-Codex leads

GPT-5-Codex: 42.4 (#103), Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMistral 7B
WeirdML54.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—19.5%
LMArena Coding—1082
BigCodeBench Complete—27.3%
HumanEval+—36%
MBPP+—42.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: 31.0 (#72), Mistral 7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMistral 7B
Terminal-Bench44.3%—

Reasoning GPT-5-Codex leads

GPT-5-Codex: 30.9 (#83), Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMistral 7B
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1067
DTBench—42.5%
Adversarial NLI—47.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—56.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—112.21
HellaSwag—81%
PIQA—83%
WinoGrande—75.3%

Math Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMistral 7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—0.3%
LMArena Math—1085
MATH Level 5—3.7%
GSM8K—54.4%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMistral 7B
GPQA Diamond—15.2%
LMArena Expert—1036
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.6%
BoolQ—87.4%
MMLU—62.5%
OpenBookQA—79.8%
TriviaQA—75.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMistral 7B
LMArena Non-English—1012
LMArena Chinese—1009
LMArena French—1037
LMArena German—987
LMArena Japanese—878
LMArena Russian—1018
LMArena Spanish—1026

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMistral 7B
LMArena Instruction Following—1060

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMistral 7B
LMArena Longer Query—1060

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMistral 7B
LMArena Text—1090
LMArena Creative Writing—1068
LMArena Multi-Turn—1062

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5-Codex better than Mistral 7B?

GPT-5-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 14× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5-Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5-Codex or Mistral 7B?

Mistral 7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; GPT-5-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is GPT-5-Codex or Mistral 7B better for coding?

GPT-5-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5-Codex and Mistral 7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5-Codex has 3 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper