Model comparison

GPT-5-Codex vs Magistral Medium

GPT-5-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5-Codex OpenAI

37.3

Rank #190 Reported

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

34.8

Rank #224 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5-Codex scores higher in 2 categories and Magistral Medium in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5-Codex leads 30.0 to 8.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 70.3% for GPT-5-Codex and 16.2% for Magistral Medium.
  • Magistral Medium is cheaper at $2 / $5 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5-Codex.
  • GPT-5-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 128K.
  • Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5-Codex and Magistral Medium specifications
GPT-5-CodexMagistral Medium
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Noometry Index37.334.8
Released2025-09-152025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K128K
Max output128K16K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$2
Output $ / M tokens$10$5
Results tracked322

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5-Codex leads

GPT-5-Codex: 41.9 (#100), Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMagistral Medium
SciCode—39.2%
WeirdML54.5%—
LMArena Coding—1319

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: 30.8 (#66), Magistral Medium: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMagistral Medium
Terminal-Bench44.3%—

Reasoning GPT-5-Codex leads

GPT-5-Codex: 30.0 (#80), Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMagistral Medium
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%16.2%
ARC-AGI-2—0%
ARC-AGI-1—6.1%
CritPt—0.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1267

Math Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMagistral Medium
LMArena Math—1249

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMagistral Medium
LMArena Expert—1222

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMagistral Medium
LMArena Non-English—1232
LMArena Chinese—1225
LMArena French—1268
LMArena German—1248
LMArena Japanese—1176
LMArena Korean—1125
LMArena Russian—1224
LMArena Spanish—1269

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMagistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following—1254

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMagistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query—1295

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5-Codex: —, Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5-CodexMagistral Medium
LMArena Text—1255
LMArena Creative Writing—1245
LMArena Multi-Turn—1275

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5-Codex better than Magistral Medium?

GPT-5-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5-Codex or Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; GPT-5-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is GPT-5-Codex or Magistral Medium better for coding?

GPT-5-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5-Codex and Magistral Medium share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5-Codex has 3 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper