Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen-7B

GPT-5.6 Terra has enough public results to be ranked (#17); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI

59.2

Rank #17 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Qwen-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.6 Terra and Qwen-7B specifications
GPT-5.6 TerraQwen-7B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.2—
Released2026-07-092023-09-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$12—
Results tracked528

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 57.7 (#19), Qwen-7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraQwen-7B
DeepSWE69.6%—
FrontierCode41.3%—
CursorBench41.3%—
LMArena WebDev1522—
SciCode55%—
WeirdML78.3%—
LMArena Coding1484—
ALE-Bench1,951—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 40.1 (#25), Qwen-7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraQwen-7B
APEX-Agents58.2%—
BALROG53.2%—
GDP.pdf24.7%—
Vending-Bench 27,343—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 60.7 (#21), Qwen-7B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraQwen-7B
Epoch Capabilities Index159.62106.83
ARC-AGI-283.9%—
SimpleBench48.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark51.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)78.4%—
ARC-AGI-196.5%—
CritPt30%—
Chess Puzzles54%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1468—
Mystery Game Puzzles35%—
DTBench93.3%—
LMCA55%—
Surface Evolver Bench83.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard—45%
LAMBADA—67.9%
PIQA—77.9%

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 81.6 (#12), Qwen-7B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraQwen-7B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)86%—
FrontierMath Tier 470.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.7%—
ProofBench74%—
LMArena Math1466—
GSM8K—51.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 61.2 (#30), Qwen-7B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraQwen-7B
GPQA Diamond93.3%—
SimpleQA Verified43.2%—
LMArena Expert1492—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—75.3%
BoolQ—76.4%
MMLU—45%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 47.3 (#11), Qwen-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraQwen-7B
LMArena Vision1271—
Blueprint-Bench 230.8%—
Furniture Assembly54.2%—
LMArena Document1472—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 54.4 (#44), Qwen-7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraQwen-7B
LMArena Non-English1439—
LMArena Chinese1513—
LMArena French1471—
LMArena German1460—
LMArena Japanese1457—
LMArena Korean1425—
LMArena Russian1450—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 76.4 (#40), Qwen-7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraQwen-7B
LMArena Instruction Following1454—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 44.4 (#68), Qwen-7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraQwen-7B
LMArena Longer Query1451—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Terra: 70.2 (#23), Qwen-7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 TerraQwen-7B
LMArena Text1447—
LMArena Creative Writing1410—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1855—
EQ-Bench 41234—
LMArena Multi-Turn1449—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.6 Terra better than Qwen-7B?

GPT-5.6 Terra has enough public results to be ranked (#17); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.6 Terra and Qwen-7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.6 Terra has 52 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.

Related comparisons

Go deeper