Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen-7B

GPT-5.6 Luna has enough public results to be ranked (#30); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI

54.6

Rank #30 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Qwen-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen-7B specifications
GPT-5.6 LunaQwen-7B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.6—
Released2026-07-092023-09-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked528

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Luna: 54.5 (#28), Qwen-7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen-7B
DeepSWE67.2%—
FrontierCode39.8%—
CursorBench35.9%—
LMArena WebDev1519—
SciCode53.6%—
WeirdML60.9%—
LMArena Coding1466—
ALE-Bench1,667—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Luna: 34.4 (#45), Qwen-7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen-7B
APEX-Agents43%—
BALROG45.6%—
GDP.pdf22.7%—
Vending-Bench 24,095—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Luna: 47.6 (#43), Qwen-7B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen-7B
Epoch Capabilities Index156.39106.83
ARC-AGI-259.5%—
SimpleBench46.8%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark49.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)69.4%—
ARC-AGI-188%—
CritPt20.6%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1451—
Mystery Game Puzzles21%—
DTBench89.1%—
LMCA48.5%—
Surface Evolver Bench61.9%—
BIG-Bench Hard—45%
LAMBADA—67.9%
PIQA—77.9%

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Luna: 77.7 (#14), Qwen-7B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen-7B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)82.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 461%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.3%—
ProofBench60%—
LMArena Math1458—
GSM8K—51.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Luna: 58.5 (#34), Qwen-7B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen-7B
GPQA Diamond91.6%—
SimpleQA Verified41%—
LMArena Expert1478—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—75.3%
BoolQ—76.4%
MMLU—45%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Luna: 42.7 (#28), Qwen-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen-7B
LMArena Vision1258—
Blueprint-Bench 222.6%—
Furniture Assembly42.5%—
LMArena Document1457—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Luna: 52.8 (#78), Qwen-7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen-7B
LMArena Non-English1417—
LMArena Chinese1470—
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1454—
LMArena Japanese1411—
LMArena Korean1415—
LMArena Russian1428—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Luna: 75.6 (#57), Qwen-7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen-7B
LMArena Instruction Following1437—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Luna: 43.9 (#82), Qwen-7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen-7B
LMArena Longer Query1436—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Luna: 68.0 (#29), Qwen-7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaQwen-7B
LMArena Text1431—
LMArena Creative Writing1396—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1829—
EQ-Bench 41156—
LMArena Multi-Turn1434—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.6 Luna better than Qwen-7B?

GPT-5.6 Luna has enough public results to be ranked (#30); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.6 Luna and Qwen-7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.6 Luna has 52 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.

Related comparisons

Go deeper