Model comparison
GPT-5.6 Luna vs Longcat Flash Chat
GPT-5.6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher in 8 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.6 Luna leads 77.7 to 39.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 69.4% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat.
- Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.6 Luna | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 54.6 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2026-07-09 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 52 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.6 Luna leads
GPT-5.6 Luna: 54.5 (#28), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1471 |
| DeepSWE | 67.2% | — |
| FrontierCode | 39.8% | — |
| CursorBench | 35.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1519 | — |
| SciCode | 53.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 60.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,667 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.6 Luna: 34.4 (#45), Longcat Flash Chat: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 43% | — |
| BALROG | 45.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 22.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 4,095 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.6 Luna leads
GPT-5.6 Luna: 47.6 (#43), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 49.1% | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 69.4% | 17.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1451 | 1440 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 59.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 88% | — |
| CritPt | 20.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 21% | — |
| DTBench | 89.1% | — |
| LMCA | 48.5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 61.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.39 | — |
Math GPT-5.6 Luna leads
GPT-5.6 Luna: 77.7 (#14), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1458 | 1442 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 61% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 60% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.6 Luna leads
GPT-5.6 Luna: 58.5 (#34), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | 1454 |
| GPQA Diamond | 91.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.6 Luna: 42.7 (#28), Longcat Flash Chat: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1258 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 22.6% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 42.5% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1457 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
GPT-5.6 Luna: 52.8 (#78), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1470 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1408 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1411 | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | 1415 | 1371 |
| LMArena Russian | 1428 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | 1445 |
Instruction Following GPT-5.6 Luna leads
GPT-5.6 Luna: 75.6 (#57), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1411 |
Long Context Too close to call
GPT-5.6 Luna: 43.9 (#82), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1436 | 1425 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.6 Luna leads
GPT-5.6 Luna: 68.0 (#29), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1431 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1396 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1418 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1829 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1156 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.6 Luna better than Longcat Flash Chat?
GPT-5.6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.6 Luna or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?
GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.5 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.6 Luna and Longcat Flash Chat share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.6 Luna has 52 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.