Model comparison

GPT-5.5 vs video-SALMONN 2+

GPT-5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#9); video-SALMONN 2+ does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

63.4

Rank #9 Confirmed

video-SALMONN 2+ ByteDance Seed

41.4

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where GPT-5.5 leads 46.9 to 42.5.

Side by side

GPT-5.5 and video-SALMONN 2+ specifications
GPT-5.5video-SALMONN 2+
ProviderOpenAIByteDance Seed
Noometry Index63.441.4
Released2026-04-232025-06-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$30—
Results tracked711

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.5: 58.2 (#17), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5video-SALMONN 2+
SWE-bench Verified80.6%—
DeepSWE67%—
FrontierCode43%—
LMArena WebDev1513—
SciCode56.1%—
GSO40.2%—
WeirdML84.9%—
LMArena Coding1494—
MirrorCode10%—
ALE-Bench1,943—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.5: 50.7 (#6), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5video-SALMONN 2+
Terminal-Bench84.7%—
APEX-Agents55.1%—
OSWorld 2.013%—
Remote Labor Index6.3%—
τ²-bench Banking44.6%—
DeepResearch Bench54%—
PostTrainBench27.2%—
ExploitBench47.4%—
GBAEval53.2%—
GDP.pdf26%—
LMArena Search1242—
Vending-Bench 27,524—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.5: 72.8 (#11), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5video-SALMONN 2+
ARC-AGI-285%—
SimpleBench69%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark88.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)96.2%—
ARC-AGI-195%—
CritPt27.1%—
Chess Puzzles54%—
EBR-Bench34.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1489—
Mystery Game Puzzles56%—
DTBench96%—
LMCA54.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench88.1%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index159.1—
ForecastBench60.6—

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.5: 81.7 (#11), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.5: 64.4 (#17), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5video-SALMONN 2+
GPQA Diamond94%—
SimpleQA Verified63%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal GPT-5.5 leads

GPT-5.5: 46.9 (#12), video-SALMONN 2+: 42.5

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5video-SALMONN 2+
LMArena Vision1297—
Video-MME—79.7%
Blueprint-Bench 236.2%—
Furniture Assembly44.2%—
LMArena Document1486—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.5: 56.4 (#20), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5video-SALMONN 2+
LMArena Non-English1467—
LMArena Chinese1533—
LMArena French1486—
LMArena German1480—
LMArena Japanese1498—
LMArena Korean1460—
LMArena Russian1473—
LMArena Spanish1468—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.5: 77.5 (#18), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5video-SALMONN 2+
LMArena Instruction Following1479—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.5: 48.3 (#12), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5video-SALMONN 2+
CL-bench Life22.2%—
LMArena Longer Query1484—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.5: 72.7 (#13), video-SALMONN 2+: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5video-SALMONN 2+
LMArena Text1472—
LMArena Creative Writing1455—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1844—
EQ-Bench 41315—
LMArena Multi-Turn1476—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 better than video-SALMONN 2+?

GPT-5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#9); video-SALMONN 2+ does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 and video-SALMONN 2+ share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 has 71 scored results on Noometry and video-SALMONN 2+ has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper