Model comparison

GPT-5.5 vs Llama 4 Scout

GPT-5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 63.4 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Scout costs 75× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 32 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

63.4

Rank #9 Confirmed

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 32 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 scores higher in 10 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.5 leads 72.8 to 9.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 95% for GPT-5.5 and 0.5% for Llama 4 Scout.
  • Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $5 / $30 for GPT-5.5.
  • GPT-5.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.5 and Llama 4 Scout specifications
GPT-5.5Llama 4 Scout
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index63.427.7
Released2026-04-232025-04-05
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M128K
Max output128K4K
Input $ / M tokens$5$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$30$0.30
Results tracked7143

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.5 leads

GPT-5.5: 58.2 (#17), Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5Llama 4 Scout
SciCode56.1%17%
LMArena Coding14941286
SWE-bench Verified80.6%—
DeepSWE67%—
FrontierCode43%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9.1%
LMArena WebDev1513—
GSO40.2%—
WeirdML84.9%—
MirrorCode10%—
BigCodeBench Complete—43.1%
ALE-Bench1,943—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5.5 leads

GPT-5.5: 50.7 (#6), Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5Llama 4 Scout
Terminal-Bench84.7%—
APEX-Agents55.1%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.1%
OSWorld 2.013%—
Remote Labor Index6.3%—
τ²-bench Banking44.6%—
DeepResearch Bench54%—
PostTrainBench27.2%—
ExploitBench47.4%—
GBAEval53.2%—
GDP.pdf26%—
LMArena Search1242—
Vending-Bench 27,524—

Reasoning GPT-5.5 leads

GPT-5.5: 72.8 (#11), Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5Llama 4 Scout
ARC-AGI-285%0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark88.8%36.9%
ARC-AGI-195%0.5%
CritPt27.1%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14891266
DTBench96%57.9%
LMCA54.3%12%
Epoch Capabilities Index159.1129.64
ForecastBench60.657.5
SimpleBench69%—
NYT Connections (extended)96.2%—
Chess Puzzles54%—
EBR-Bench34.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles56%—
Surface Evolver Bench88.1%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—

Math GPT-5.5 leads

GPT-5.5: 81.7 (#11), Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286)

Knowledge GPT-5.5 leads

GPT-5.5: 64.4 (#17), Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5Llama 4 Scout
GPQA Diamond94%51.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%7.7%
LMArena Expert15081235
SimpleQA Verified63%—
MMLU-Pro—74.2%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%

Multimodal GPT-5.5 leads

GPT-5.5: 46.9 (#12), Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision12971118
Blueprint-Bench 236.2%—
Furniture Assembly44.2%—
LMArena Document1486—
SpatialViz-Bench—34.2%

Multilingual GPT-5.5 leads

GPT-5.5: 56.4 (#20), Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Non-English14671252
LMArena Chinese15331255
LMArena French14861282
LMArena German14801272
LMArena Japanese14981206
LMArena Korean14601207
LMArena Russian14731263
LMArena Spanish14681278

Instruction Following GPT-5.5 leads

GPT-5.5: 77.5 (#18), Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Instruction Following14791248
IFEval—81.8%

Long Context GPT-5.5 leads

GPT-5.5: 48.3 (#12), Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Longer Query14841265
Fiction.LiveBench—36%
CL-bench Life22.2%—

Writing & Preference GPT-5.5 leads

GPT-5.5: 72.7 (#13), Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Text14721279
LMArena Creative Writing14551249
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1844783
LMArena Multi-Turn14761280
WildBench—78%
EQ-Bench 41315—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 better than Llama 4 Scout?

GPT-5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 63.4 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Scout costs 75× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 lists at $5 and $30.

Is GPT-5.5 or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

GPT-5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.2 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 and Llama 4 Scout share?

32 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 has 71 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper