Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Step 5 Preview

GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 47.9 on the Noometry Index. Step 5 Preview costs 47× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI

64.3

Rank #8 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Step 5 Preview in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 84.0 to 46.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 30.6% for GPT-5.5 Pro and 20.9% for Step 5 Preview.
  • Step 5 Preview is cheaper at $1 / $2.70 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.5 Pro.
  • GPT-5.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.02M.

Side by side

GPT-5.5 Pro and Step 5 Preview specifications
GPT-5.5 ProStep 5 Preview
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index64.347.9
Released2026-04-232026-09-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1.02M
Max output128K66K
Input $ / M tokens$30$1
Output $ / M tokens$180$2.70
Results tracked1418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%
LMArena Coding—1480

Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.3 (#10), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProStep 5 Preview
CritPt30.6%20.9%
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
SimpleBench76.9%—
ARC-AGI-196.5%—
Chess Puzzles64%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1465
DTBench96%—
LMCA53.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.07—

Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 84.0 (#10), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProStep 5 Preview
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)87.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 478%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench—42%
LMArena Math—1470
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)52.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)39.6%—

Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.1 (#19), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProStep 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond93.9%—
LMArena Expert—1470

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English—1432
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena Russian—1436
LMArena Spanish—1439

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1444

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text—1442
LMArena Creative Writing—1410
LMArena Multi-Turn—1447

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Step 5 Preview?

GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 47.9 on the Noometry Index. Step 5 Preview costs 47× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 Pro or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2.70 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.02M.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and Step 5 Preview share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper