Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Max

GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 51.4 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Max costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 10 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI

64.3

Rank #7 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max

Alibaba (Qwen)

51.4

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 73.6 to 48.4.
The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 64% for GPT-5.5 Pro and 19% for Qwen3.7 Max.
Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper at $2.50 / $7.50 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.5 Pro.
GPT-5.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

GPT-5.5 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
	GPT-5.5 Pro	Qwen3.7 Max
Provider	OpenAI	Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index	64.3	51.4
Released	2026-04-23	2026-05-19
Weights	Proprietary	Proprietary
Context window	1.05M	1M
Max output	128K	131K
Input $ / M tokens	$30	$2.50
Output $ / M tokens	$180	$7.50
Results tracked	14	33

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-5.5 Pro	Qwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified	—	77.3%
LMArena WebDev	—	1515
SciCode	—	48.8%
LMArena Coding	—	1498
ALE-Bench	—	1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-5.5 Pro	Qwen3.7 Max
GBAEval	—	0.4%

Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.6 (#7), Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-5.5 Pro	Qwen3.7 Max
SimpleBench	76.9%	70.4%
CritPt	30.6%	13.4%
Chess Puzzles	64%	19%
DTBench	96%	92.3%
LMCA	53.9%	44%
Epoch Capabilities Index	162.45	153.74
ARC-AGI-2	84.6%	—
NYT Connections (extended)	—	85.1%
ARC-AGI-1	96.5%	—
EBR-Bench	—	9.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts	—	1483
Mystery Game Puzzles	—	32%

Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 83.8 (#8), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-5.5 Pro	Qwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)	87.7%	64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4	78%	34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	100%	95.6%
ProofBench	—	26%
LMArena Math	—	1488
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)	52.4%	—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)	39.6%	—

Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.2 (#17), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-5.5 Pro	Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond	93.9%	90.9%
SimpleQA Verified	—	55.8%
LMArena Expert	—	1488

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-5.5 Pro	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English	—	1475
LMArena Chinese	—	1533
LMArena Russian	—	1482

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-5.5 Pro	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following	—	1460

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-5.5 Pro	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query	—	1484

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	GPT-5.5 Pro	Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text	—	1476
LMArena Creative Writing	—	1450
EQ-Bench 4	—	1110
LMArena Multi-Turn	—	1482

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 Pro or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper. It lists at $2.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.