Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Mistral Large

GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Large costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI

64.3

Rank #8 Confirmed

Mistral Large Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #263 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Large in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 84.0 to 18.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for GPT-5.5 Pro and 8.5% for Mistral Large.
  • Mistral Large is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.5 Pro.
  • GPT-5.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • Mistral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.5 Pro and Mistral Large specifications
GPT-5.5 ProMistral Large
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Noometry Index64.331.9
Released2026-04-232024-02-26
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M131K
Max output128K16K
Input $ / M tokens$30$2
Output $ / M tokens$180$6
Results tracked1451

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large
SciCode—36.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—30%
LiveBench Coding—47.1%
LMArena Coding—1277
BigCodeBench Complete—38.3%
ALE-Bench—264.7
HumanEval+—62.2%
MBPP+—59.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—38.4%

Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.3 (#10), Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large
SimpleBench76.9%22.5%
CritPt30.6%0%
DTBench96%65.1%
LMCA53.9%16.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index162.07128.52
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
ARC-AGI-196.5%—
Chess Puzzles64%—
LiveBench Reasoning—43.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1257
LiveBench Data Analysis—50.1%
ForecastBench—57.1
LiveBench—48.4%

Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 84.0 (#10), Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%8.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)52.4%0.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)87.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 478%—
Omni-MATH—28.1%
LiveBench Math—42.5%
LMArena Math—1262
MATH Level 5—50.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)39.6%—

Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.1 (#19), Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large
GPQA Diamond93.9%51.3%
MMLU-Pro—59.9%
Confabulations—21.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.5%
GPQA (HELM)—43.5%
LMArena Expert—1232
MMLU—80%

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large
LMArena Non-English—1237
LMArena Chinese—1240
LMArena French—1325
LMArena German—1254
LMArena Japanese—1188
LMArena Korean—1202
LMArena Russian—1257
LMArena Spanish—1268

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large
LiveBench Instruction Following—67.9%
IFEval—87.7%
LMArena Instruction Following—1249

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large
LMArena Longer Query—1261

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMistral Large
LMArena Text—1266
LMArena Creative Writing—1243
Short-Story Creative Writing—69%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—985
WildBench—80.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1260
LiveBench Language—39.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Mistral Large?

GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Large costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 Pro or Mistral Large?

Mistral Large is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and Mistral Large share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper