Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Pro vs Longcat Flash Chat
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 73.6 to 18.3.
- Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 64.3 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-23 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1471 |
Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.6 (#7), Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 96.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 64% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1440 |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 53.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.45 | — |
Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 83.8 (#8), Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 87.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 78% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1441 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 52.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 39.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.2 (#17), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1454 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1457 |
| LMArena German | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1445 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1411 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1425 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1418 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Longcat Flash Chat?
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and Longcat Flash Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.