Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Pro vs Llama 3.2 90B
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 84.0 to 11.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for GPT-5.5 Pro and 2.6% for Llama 3.2 90B.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 64.3 | 27.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-23 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.3 (#10), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.07 | 125.5 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 96.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 64% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 53.9% | — |
Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 84.0 (#10), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 2.6% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 87.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 78% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 52.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 39.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.1 (#19), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% | 41% |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Llama 3.2 90B?
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and Llama 3.2 90B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.