Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Pro vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 83.8 to 33.1.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 64.3 | 38.0 |
| Released | 2026-04-23 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1307 |
Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.6 (#7), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 96.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 64% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1286 |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 53.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.45 | — |
Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 83.8 (#8), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 87.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 78% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1281 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 52.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 39.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.2 (#17), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1276 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1266 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1277 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1342 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1284 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.