Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Instant vs Qwen3-4B

GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

42.7

Rank #110 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3-4B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.5 Instant leads 48.9 to 33.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 82.5% for GPT-5.5 Instant and 52.3% for Qwen3-4B.
  • Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.5 Instant and Qwen3-4B specifications
GPT-5.5 InstantQwen3-4B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.731.9
Released2026-05-052025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked276

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3-4B
SciCode48.6%—
LMArena Coding1433—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning GPT-5.5 Instant leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles12%4%
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1426—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.52—

Math Qwen3-4B leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3-4B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202568.1%52.2%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
LMArena Math1420—

Knowledge GPT-5.5 Instant leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond82.5%52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
LMArena Expert1409—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52), Qwen3-4B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3-4B
LMArena Vision1250—
LMArena Document1403—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1417—
LMArena Chinese1456—
LMArena French1428—
LMArena German1411—
LMArena Japanese1408—
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Russian1431—
LMArena Spanish1429—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1406—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1422—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1419—
LMArena Creative Writing1419—
LMArena Multi-Turn1433—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 Instant better than Qwen3-4B?

GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Instant and Qwen3-4B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Instant has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper