Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Instant vs Mistral Small 3.2
GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.5 Instant leads 48.9 to 26.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 68.1% for GPT-5.5 Instant and 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Instant | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.7 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2026-05-05 | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 48.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1433 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | 1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.52 | 131.74 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | — |
Math Too close to call
GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.1% | 30.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1420 | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.5% | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1250 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1403 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | — |
| LMArena French | 1428 | — |
| LMArena German | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1429 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Instant better than Mistral Small 3.2?
GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Instant and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Instant has 27 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.