Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Instant vs Mistral

GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

42.7

Rank #110 Confirmed

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.5 Instant leads 48.9 to 16.6.

Side by side

GPT-5.5 Instant and Mistral specifications
GPT-5.5 InstantMistral
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Noometry Index42.729.9
Released2026-05-05—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2722

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.5 Instant leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Coding14331162
SciCode48.6%—

Reasoning GPT-5.5 Instant leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Hard Prompts14261149
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.52—

Math GPT-5.5 Instant leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Math14201180
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202568.1%—
Omni-MATH—7.2%

Knowledge GPT-5.5 Instant leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Expert14091125
GPQA Diamond82.5%—
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52), Mistral: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Vision1250—
LMArena Document1403—

Multilingual GPT-5.5 Instant leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Non-English14171129
LMArena Chinese14561109
LMArena French14281180
LMArena German14111155
LMArena Japanese14081013
LMArena Korean13921032
LMArena Russian14311168
LMArena Spanish14291143

Instruction Following GPT-5.5 Instant leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Instruction Following14061152
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context GPT-5.5 Instant leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Longer Query14221153

Writing & Preference GPT-5.5 Instant leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantMistral
LMArena Text14191165
LMArena Creative Writing14191158
LMArena Multi-Turn14331147
WildBench—66%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 Instant better than Mistral?

GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.5 Instant or Mistral better for coding?

GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Instant and Mistral share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Instant has 27 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper