Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Instant vs Longcat Flash Chat

GPT-5.5 Instant and Longcat Flash Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.7 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

42.7

Rank #110 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher in 5 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 39.4 to 26.5.
  • Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.5 Instant and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
GPT-5.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
ProviderOpenAIMeituan
Noometry Index42.742.1
Released2026-05-05—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding14331471
SciCode48.6%—

Reasoning GPT-5.5 Instant leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts14261440
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.52—

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math14201442
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202568.1%—

Knowledge GPT-5.5 Instant leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert14091454
GPQA Diamond82.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52), Longcat Flash Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Vision1250—
LMArena Document1403—

Multilingual Too close to call

GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English14171404
LMArena Chinese14561465
LMArena French14281456
LMArena German14111408
LMArena Japanese14081373
LMArena Korean13921371
LMArena Russian14311395
LMArena Spanish14291445

Instruction Following Too close to call

GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following14061411

Long Context Too close to call

GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query14221425

Writing & Preference Too close to call

GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text14191427
LMArena Creative Writing14191388
LMArena Multi-Turn14331418

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 Instant better than Longcat Flash Chat?

GPT-5.5 Instant and Longcat Flash Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.7 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is GPT-5.5 Instant or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (44.3 vs 43.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Instant and Longcat Flash Chat share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Instant has 27 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper