Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Instant vs Hunyuan Large Vision
GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.5 Instant leads 61.8 to 46.5.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 42.7 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2026-05-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1433 | 1308 |
| SciCode | 48.6% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | 1257 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.52 | — |
Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1268 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.1% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | 1252 |
| GPQA Diamond | 82.5% | — |
Multimodal GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1250 | 1180 |
| LMArena Document | 1403 | — |
Multilingual GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1243 |
| LMArena French | 1428 | — |
| LMArena German | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1429 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1251 |
Long Context GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1280 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1254 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Instant better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.5 Instant or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Instant and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Instant has 27 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.