Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Instant vs Grok 4.5
Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 42.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.5 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.5 leads 60.9 to 26.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 26.3% for GPT-5.5 Instant and 57.2% for Grok 4.5.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.7 | 55.0 |
| Released | 2026-05-05 | 2026-07-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74), Grok 4.5: 52.2 (#35)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 48.6% | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1433 | 1474 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1553 |
| WeirdML | — | 46.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,309 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Instant: —, Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#17)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 56.2% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 47.9% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 23.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 65.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 14% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1213 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 3,887 |
Reasoning Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155), Grok 4.5: 56.1 (#25)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 15.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | 36% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | 1462 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.52 | 153.92 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 52.6% |
| SimpleBench | — | 70% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 83.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.2% |
| DTBench | — | 96.5% |
| LMCA | — | 45.2% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 74.4% |
Math Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259), Grok 4.5: 60.9 (#35)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26.3% | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | 24.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.1% | 97.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1459 |
| ProofBench | — | 31% |
Knowledge Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74), Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#24)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.5% | 93.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | 1466 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.3% |
Multimodal GPT-5.5 Instant leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52), Grok 4.5: 37.6 (#72)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1250 | 1288 |
| LMArena Document | 1403 | 1452 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 27.3% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 22.5% |
Multilingual Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80), Grok 4.5: 54.4 (#42)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1496 |
| LMArena French | 1428 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1411 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1428 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1404 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1448 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1429 | 1450 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100), Grok 4.5: 76.0 (#48)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1446 |
Long Context Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96), Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#56)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1463 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.5 leads
GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85), Grok 4.5: 65.8 (#42)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Instant | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1442 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1456 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1579 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Instant better than Grok 4.5?
Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 42.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.5 Instant or Grok 4.5 better for coding?
Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.2 versus 44.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Instant and Grok 4.5 share?
27 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Instant has 27 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.5 has 52.