Model comparison

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Step 3.5 Flash

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.5 Flash costs 450× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 Pro OpenAI

58.9

Rank #18 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 22.2.
  • Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
  • GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 Pro and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
GPT-5.4 ProStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index58.942.3
Released2026-03-052026-01-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M256K
Max output128K256K
Input $ / M tokens$30$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$180$0.30
Results tracked1619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProStep 3.5 Flash
WeirdML57.4%—
LMArena Coding—1436

Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProStep 3.5 Flash
ARC-AGI-283.3%—
SimpleBench74.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
CritPt30%—
Chess Puzzles58.6%—
EnigmaEval23.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1411
Epoch Capabilities Index158.93—

Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProStep 3.5 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)82.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 458.5%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%
LMArena Math—1408
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)50%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)37.5%—

Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProStep 3.5 Flash
GPQA Diamond94.6%—
Humanity's Last Exam44.3%—
SimpleQA Verified46.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.3%—
LMArena Expert—1421

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1385
LMArena Chinese—1447
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1354
LMArena Korean—1352
LMArena Russian—1385
LMArena Spanish—1419

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1385

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1402

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text—1403
LMArena Creative Writing—1357
LMArena Multi-Turn—1405

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Step 3.5 Flash?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.5 Flash costs 450× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.2 vs 42.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Step 3.5 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper