Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3 Max
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 43.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Max costs 28× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3 Max in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 22.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 82.5% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 18.9% for Qwen3 Max.
- Qwen3 Max is cheaper at $1.20 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 43.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2025-09-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | 4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | 142.38 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1448 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | 18.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1446 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | 48.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1455 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1449 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1462 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1419 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1438 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen3 Max?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 43.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Max costs 28× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3 Max?
Qwen3 Max is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3 Max better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.2 vs 43.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3 Max share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.