Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 96× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 39.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 82.5% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 34.4% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 30% | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | 147.37 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | 34.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | 87.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1440 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 96× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?
GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.