Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen2-72B
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2-72B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 23.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 94.6% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 40.8% for Qwen2-72B.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2024-06-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | 125.28 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1191 |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | 40.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1240 |
| LMArena French | — | 1170 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1169 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1181 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1192 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1196 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen2-72B?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen2-72B better for coding?
GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen2-72B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.