Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen2.5-Max
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 71.0 to 24.6.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 58.8 | 40.1 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2025-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1359 |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10), Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.12 | 132.54 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1360 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1369 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1382 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1377 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1335 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1358 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1339 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1364 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen2.5-Max?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?
GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 41.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen2.5-Max share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.