Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen Turbo
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 771× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Turbo in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 72.4 to 15.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 94.6% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 41.8% for Qwen Turbo.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
- GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | — |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | 41.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen Turbo?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 771× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen Turbo share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.