Model comparison

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen Plus

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 112× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 Pro OpenAI

58.9

Rank #18 Confirmed

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen Plus in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 72.4 to 23.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 94.6% for GPT-5.4 Pro and 48.1% for Qwen Plus.
  • Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
  • GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen Plus specifications
GPT-5.4 ProQwen Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index58.937.1
Released2026-03-052024-01-25
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output128K33K
Input $ / M tokens$30$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$180$1.20
Results tracked1620

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen Plus
WeirdML57.4%—
LMArena Coding—1328

Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen Plus
ARC-AGI-283.3%—
SimpleBench74.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.3%
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
CritPt30%—
Chess Puzzles58.6%—
EnigmaEval23.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1317
DTBench—81.1%
LMCA—24%
Epoch Capabilities Index158.93—

Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen Plus
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)50%1.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)82.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 458.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—17.8%
LMArena Math—1326
MATH Level 5—65.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)37.5%—

Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen Plus
GPQA Diamond94.6%48.1%
Humanity's Last Exam44.3%—
SimpleQA Verified46.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.3%—
LMArena Expert—1328

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen Plus
LMArena Non-English—1310
LMArena Chinese—1347
LMArena Japanese—1251
LMArena Russian—1323

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following—1303

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query—1324

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen Plus
LMArena Text—1326
LMArena Creative Writing—1293
LMArena Multi-Turn—1336

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen Plus?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 112× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen Plus better for coding?

GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen Plus share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper