Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 15.5.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.