Model comparison

GPT-5.4 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Pro

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Pro costs 124× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.4 Pro OpenAI

58.9

Rank #18 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 22.1.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.4 Pro.
  • GPT-5.4 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.05M.

Side by side

GPT-5.4 Pro and MiMo-V2-Pro specifications
GPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Noometry Index58.943.0
Released2026-03-052026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1.05M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$30$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$180$0.87
Results tracked1623

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena WebDev—1433
WeirdML57.4%—
LMArena Coding—1476
ALE-Bench—785.17

Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
ARC-AGI-283.3%—
SimpleBench74.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—25.8%
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
CritPt30%—
Chess Puzzles58.6%—
EnigmaEval23.8%—
Thematic Generalization—45.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1457
Epoch Capabilities Index158.93—

Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)82.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 458.5%—
LMArena Math—1447
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)50%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)37.5%—

Knowledge GPT-5.4 Pro leads

GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
GPQA Diamond94.6%—
Humanity's Last Exam44.3%—
SimpleQA Verified46.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.3%—
LMArena Expert—1478

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1416
LMArena Chinese—1456
LMArena French—1469
LMArena German—1417
LMArena Japanese—1366
LMArena Korean—1400
LMArena Russian—1427
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1445

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.4 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text—1436
LMArena Creative Writing—1415
LMArena Multi-Turn—1456

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Pro costs 124× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

Is GPT-5.4 Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.2 vs 43.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper