Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Llama 13b
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 70.7 to 14.0.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 58.9 | 24.4 |
| Released | 2026-03-05 | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 43.2 (#90), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 683 |
Reasoning GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 70.7 (#13), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 158.93 | 100.58 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 83.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 74.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 94.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 58.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math GPT-5.4 Pro leads
GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.4 (#22), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 82.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 58.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 50% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 37.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#7), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.6% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 819 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 781 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.4 Pro: —, Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Llama 13b?
GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.4 Pro or Llama 13b better for coding?
GPT-5.4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.4 Pro and Llama 13b share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.4 Pro has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.